By Craig Cockburn, IT Professional from Scotland. Critical Thinking, Agile Delivery, Politics and Society
Total Pageviews
16 March 2006
Managment institute
14 March 2006
The Last Guide to Smoke Free Scotland
13 March 2006
Dunblane, 10 years, ID cards.
http://tinyurl.com/emej3
10 years on, two things strike me. One is that after my father died 2 years ago and who I wrote about above, he is now buried near the garden of remembrance. The tragedy of 10 years ago is a regular reminder to us when we visit his grave. In the 10 years that have passed we have got
married and had a family. Our children, now about the age that the children were that day enjoy playing in the fountain set up in the garden of remembrance. We were told that this was no Diana memorial, it was supposed to be a place where children could play. How could I have
imagined that 10 years on my own family would become connected to this tragedy in such a way.
The other is the ongoing lack of a national gun register. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-2070882,00.html. One of the earliest promises by Tony Blair in 1997 after being elected, the Scottish forces set up a central database in 1998, two years after the shootings. 2006 and 10 years on from the tragedy "IT difficulties" in England and Wales have prevented it from being implemented and were as still only talking about having pilots. I can't understand why the Scottish forces can get their act together so quickly, yet despite personal support from the Prime Minister we are still waiting for a UK
wide solution nearly 10 years later. As someone who works as an IT consultant, I know it shouldn't take this long. The UK government is famous for its IT failures and this is just another in a long line (and we still have ID cards to look forward to)
Whilst Tony Blair did good to introduce the legislation banning guns, I think serious questions need to be asked this week about why something which ought to be simple and which could help prevent crime and further loss of innocent life should be taking so long and if it is Tony Blair
that should be asked at Prime Ministers Questions then so be it.
This Government appears to have little or no ability to carry out major IT projects, as the gun register has shown. The Lords are right to keep knocking back the Identity Cards Bill. It would be a misuse of the Parliament Act to override them, and a misuse of public funds. Will this be Tony Blair's Poll Tax?
12 March 2006
The Definitive Scottish Search
08 March 2006
Scottish Enterprise have a business plan?
01 March 2006
Sign up to stop spam
08 February 2006
Scotland IS
27 January 2006
The Scots Magazine
www2006
20 January 2006
Anti-spam campaign makes The Times
14 December 2005
Ending broken links
30 November 2005
Stand up for Scottish culture
Independence Convention launched
02 November 2005
05 September 2005
First Minister's Questions
And now a question from Craig Cockburn "Tony Blair has been quite open about how long he wishes to remain PM. Do you have any views on how long you wish to remain First Minister?"
The answer he gave then completely contradicted what he printed in his autobiography Lucky Jack which was published the following week.
Which of the two answers is nearer the truth? Time, especially the 2007 elections, will tell.
09 July 2005
Chinese Visit
13 April 2005
First Prize in National Competition
01 February 2005
The scam of tax fee insurance
Hi
As the owner of a Ltd company, was surprised when my accountant recently wrote to me about "Tax Fee Insurance". This seems to be a new tax on honest businesses that file on time and have accounts in order and seems to be a new way for the inland revenue to scam honest businesses out of possibly thousands of pounds, just because they are unlucky in the Inland Revenue lottery.
How it works:
1. The inland revenue encourages people to do self assessment and file online. This puts the donkey work onto ordinary people, thereby freeing up resources in the Inland Revenue for random checks.
2. As a result, more random checks are done and the figures I have is that this is now about 1 business in 10.
3. As a result of an "Aspect" or "Full" enquiry randomly selected businesses are investigated once they have filled in their annual accounts, even though there may be no suspicion of anything wrong, it is simply a random audit.
4. My accountant, who prepares the accounts has to get involved.
5. My accountant then bills me for the time they spent talking to the Inland Revenue on my behalf. Accountants are not cheap and £100 an hour is at the lower end of what they charge.
6. Accountant then presents me with a bill for several hundred or possibly thousands of pounds which I have to pay, even though it was the Inland Revenue who requested the time and work.
7. I am then several hundred or thousand pounds out of pocket even though I have done nothing wrong and my books are in order.
8. To protect me from this scam a new industry has sprung up offering "tax fee protection insurance". Rates are often £100-£120 a year and based on fixed annual renewal dates. So if you join a scheme in May and the renewal date is November, you still pay the full whack even though it's for only 6 months cover.
Can I suggest that this is hardly the spirit of enterprise and is a wholly unwelcome financial burden on small companies which are doing nothing wrong. It's random taxation.
My view is that these random audits are no bad thing, but if the Inland Revenue needs to do them, the Inland Revenue should pay. Has anyone ever tried taking them to the small claims court for this? Perhaps I could adopt the same tactic and bill the Inland Revenue for excessive time spent form filling, excessive bureaucracy, and so on. After all why should the small business have to keep forking out for dealing with Inland Revenue issues? How is this fair?
Note: Subsequent to writing the above I had the question raised in the House of Commons.
01 May 2004
Scotland Guide - 10 years old
I appear to have acquired "Legendary" status because of it!
25 November 2003
Some praise (shucks)
As was the case with many others, my first access to the internet was via a Freenet. I spent a good deal of time reading the soc.culture.scottish and the soc.culture.celtic Usenet groups.
I note that my submissions to the soc.culture.celtic faq are still up there, floating around the web for almost ten years now. Cool.
Craig Cockburn was then, and likely still is, one of the web's main Celtic and Scottish history/culture guru's, not to mention Scots Gaelic language.
Excerpt from The Campblog Archive
Popular Posts
-
I thought I would write this to document the ongoing problems I have with my Nokia N97. It seems from the conversation in the phone shop tod...
-
An article on how Agile can sit alongside PRINCE2 and where DSDM Atern fits in. In 2007, I put "used an Agile/PRINCE2 development str...
-
In contrast to my usual relaxed drive to work I was on the motorway today. Tailgaiting seems to have got worse. It's not enough to be ...
-
Every time I go to the post office there's a queue. No matter how much they try and keep the queue length down, inevitably you get stuck...
-
Dyson's motto is "100% suction all the time" or "The vacuum that doesn't lose suction". The consumers' assoc...
-
I've been having a busy time over on the Cambrian House site lately. Check out my profile and the full set of awards I completed last ...
-
It has always surprised me that in the US, where holidays are valued and children get about 6 weeks more annual holiday than the UK, that ad...
-
I am growing increasingly tired of paying increasingly high "credit card surcharges" which are little more than a front for certai...
-
Dear BBC. I am a licencepayer who lives in the UK. Your attempt at an iPlayer service for Gaelic is a disgrace. 1. The iPlayer ...
-
I first promoted Demon in June 1992, the month they set up. I joined them as a customer the following year. This is the first time I have mo...