The Scotsman reports that the mobile phone ban is to be lifted in hospitals.
One thing that has puzzled me. If the equipment is potentially sensitive to a mobile phone being used nearby and transmitting a signal to a very large receiver, surely the very large transmitter sending a signal strong enough to be picked up by a very small receiver (the mobile) would also have had an effect.
So if the hospitals were complaining about interference from mobile phones, why were they not complaining about the outbound signal from the masts at the same time?
Can anyone explain the physics?
Total Pageviews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I sometimes attend webinars in my spare time, however with Gotowebinar there is a problem If you attempt to attend the meeting a few hours...
-
Every time I go to the post office there's a queue. No matter how much they try and keep the queue length down, inevitably you get stuck...
-
On 28 Feb 2016, Dr Travis Bradberry published an article How Body Language Trumps IQ and within 24 hours it's had well over 300,000...
-
Supposing I could transform job seeking in terms of the experience the candidate has. Who would find that useful? There's 500,000 paid m...
-
United States Patent Application: 0060071122 . Well, full marks for trying I suppose. Short term memory loss when walking to the bus stop a...
-
My article about Dyson's breakdown problems made the front page of reddit and hopefully this article on Bosch will do so too because m...
-
I've been having a busy time over on the Cambrian House site lately. Check out my profile and the full set of awards I completed last ...
-
An article on how Agile can sit alongside PRINCE2 and where DSDM Atern fits in. In 2007, I put "used an Agile/PRINCE2 development str...
-
Having recently returned from a holiday in Oban, I thought it would be appropriate to comment on the state of Gaelic having been involved in...
-
In relation to further powers for the Scottish Parliament, I wrote to my SNP MSP recently. Feel free to reuse, share etc. Smith Commission...
No comments:
Post a comment