The Scotsman reports that the mobile phone ban is to be lifted in hospitals.
One thing that has puzzled me. If the equipment is potentially sensitive to a mobile phone being used nearby and transmitting a signal to a very large receiver, surely the very large transmitter sending a signal strong enough to be picked up by a very small receiver (the mobile) would also have had an effect.
So if the hospitals were complaining about interference from mobile phones, why were they not complaining about the outbound signal from the masts at the same time?
Can anyone explain the physics?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I prefer Digital by Default, I prefer a quick video chat, IM or email to having to print a form or post a letter. I prefer attending meetin...
-
Started a three week Prince2 course today. Being a bit busy at the moment what with that one and also a 7 weeks course in being a better man...
-
In January 2008, I posted an article on PRINCE2 and Agile which it seems has been #1 in Google for those search terms ever since and conse...
-
An article on how Agile can sit alongside PRINCE2 and where DSDM Atern fits in. In 2007, I put "used an Agile/PRINCE2 development str...
-
Please contact John Macleod john@andarach.com with any additions Also see http://duneideann.org/ A' chairdean,...
-
Having been on hold to the Orange contact centre (I guess that's what you would call it, I might call it a non-contact centre) for appro...
-
On 1st October 2006, the UK enacted a law to make ageism illegal . This is only for employment but nonetheless, despite privacy concerns, ma...
-
My article about Dyson's breakdown problems made the front page of reddit and hopefully this article on Bosch will do so too because m...
-
In contrast to my usual relaxed drive to work I was on the motorway today. Tailgaiting seems to have got worse. It's not enough to be ...
-
Find me on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/siliconglen/ Medium https://siliconglen.medium.com/ thanks Craig
No comments:
Post a Comment