The Scotsman reports that the mobile phone ban is to be lifted in hospitals.
One thing that has puzzled me. If the equipment is potentially sensitive to a mobile phone being used nearby and transmitting a signal to a very large receiver, surely the very large transmitter sending a signal strong enough to be picked up by a very small receiver (the mobile) would also have had an effect.
So if the hospitals were complaining about interference from mobile phones, why were they not complaining about the outbound signal from the masts at the same time?
Can anyone explain the physics?
Total Pageviews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Today I joined a group determined to fight spam through legal action . It has already been successful with one high profile victory. I also ...
-
My article about Dyson's breakdown problems made the front page of reddit and hopefully this article on Bosch will do so too because m...
-
The modelling of cause and effect is well established in various fields of science. An event (cause) results in an effect and the two event...
-
United States Patent Application: 0060071122 . Well, full marks for trying I suppose. Short term memory loss when walking to the bus stop a...
-
Supposing I could transform job seeking in terms of the experience the candidate has. Who would find that useful? There's 500,000 paid m...
-
Please send any updates, corrections or additions to John please at the address below ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Mac...
-
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Dè tha dol? Date: Mon, 3 Oct...
-
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "John Macleod" < john@andarach.com > Date: 6 Feb 2014 17:21 Subject: Gaelic ev...
-
I sometimes attend webinars in my spare time, however with Gotowebinar there is a problem If you attempt to attend the meeting a few hours...
-
On 28 Feb 2016, Dr Travis Bradberry published an article How Body Language Trumps IQ and within 24 hours it's had well over 300,000...
No comments:
Post a comment