The Scotsman reports that the mobile phone ban is to be lifted in hospitals.
One thing that has puzzled me. If the equipment is potentially sensitive to a mobile phone being used nearby and transmitting a signal to a very large receiver, surely the very large transmitter sending a signal strong enough to be picked up by a very small receiver (the mobile) would also have had an effect.
So if the hospitals were complaining about interference from mobile phones, why were they not complaining about the outbound signal from the masts at the same time?
Can anyone explain the physics?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
An article on how Agile can sit alongside PRINCE2 and where DSDM Atern fits in. In 2007, I put "used an Agile/PRINCE2 development str...
-
Your profile indicates you have been contracting recently, therefore you will only be interested in contract work then? Incorrect. Thi...
-
BBC NEWS | Politics | £141m benefits computer shelved : "It is the latest in a long series of computer problems for the government....
-
The UK Government Digital Service (GDS) has just had a reboot . However will it be value for money and deliver its objectives? Will th... -
Find me on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/siliconglen/ Medium https://siliconglen.medium.com/ thanks Craig
-
Please visit this link . I used to run a PRINCE2 group on LinkedIn, but have now closed it (no point in duplication) Craig
-
Every time I go to the post office there's a queue. No matter how much they try and keep the queue length down, inevitably you get stuck...
-
Having recently returned from a holiday in Oban, I thought it would be appropriate to comment on the state of Gaelic having been involved in...
-
Dyson's motto is "100% suction all the time" or "The vacuum that doesn't lose suction". The consumers' assoc...
-
I first promoted Demon in June 1992, the month they set up. I joined them as a customer the following year. This is the first time I have mo...
No comments:
Post a Comment